We find the repetitive task worth handing over first. We build an AI agent that does it. Then we count the hours it gives back — and your people still check the work before it goes anywhere.
About 15 minutes · stop and come back any time · free, and you keep the plan. Prefer a person? Book 20 minutes with Vasu.
We are not changing how your company works, and we are not asking anyone to learn new software. We pick one real task — something a person sits down and does every Tuesday. Then we hand the repetitive part of that task to an AI agent, which does it the same way every time.
Someone on your team still looks at the result and still signs it off. That split — agent does, person checks — is the whole thing. If it works, you do the next task. If it doesn’t, you have lost a month and learned something real.
The thirty days is a promise about the schedule, not about your numbers. How many hours come back is something we measure afterwards, never something we quote up front.
Why most first attempts don’t stick:
Good in a demo, twelve times a year in real life. The hours were never there to save.
Five people did it five slightly different ways, so an agent had nothing to copy.
If no one was measured on the task before, no one notices whether it got better after.
Your numbers, not ours. We won’t put a revenue figure on this page — the honest measure is time, and only you know yours.
That last number is what you are spending on this work today — your own figures, multiplied. The number is not a saving we are promising you. How much actually comes back depends on the task, and on how much of it can safely be handed over. The sliders stay a guess until we have timed the real thing.
Most companies have three or four possible tasks and one clear winner — and it is rarely the one people name first.
Nothing gets built until we have timed the work by hand. That timing is the only honest way to know afterwards whether anything actually changed.
One page: the task, where the work comes from, the steps, the odd cases where the agent should stop and ask, and who checks the result.
Someone sits with the person who does the task and times real ones with a stopwatch. That timing is what everything afterwards gets measured against, and you keep it either way.
One agent, one task, your rules. The agent works from what you already use — your email, your files, your records — so nobody has a new tool to learn.
The agent does the task, and your person does the same ones the usual way. Wherever the two disagree, we change the rules. That week is where the agent learns how your company does things.
The agent does the task, someone on your team looks at the result and releases it, and every step is recorded — who did what, and when.
We put the stopwatch numbers next to the numbers now, and you decide. If the difference doesn’t justify carrying on, we say so first.
The agent gets the work ready. The agent does not send it.
Nothing reaches a customer, a supplier or your records until someone on your team has seen it and chosen to send it. If a task can’t be done that way, we don’t take it on — and you will hear that in the first conversation, not three weeks in.
A quiet shortcut is worse than an obvious gap.
Anything the agent couldn’t handle comes back to a person with a reason. Anything you told it to ignore is set aside and counted, not dropped. A list that is quietly shorter than it should be is how a real problem goes unnoticed for a month.
The odd cases live in one person’s head, and that is the real reason off-the-shelf tools fail here. So the build starts by getting those cases out of it. Three things get written down, and they stay yours.
What your team does every single time, whether or not anyone ever asked them to.
The ones where the right answer is to stop and ask, not to have a go.
Checking only saves time if the person can decide in seconds. That layout is part of the build.
Different industries, same shortlist. These nine usually say yes to all four questions, and one of them is probably sitting in somebody’s week right now.
None of these are exotic, and that is exactly the point. The first task should be boring, obvious and annoying — something your team will be glad to hand over, and will notice straight away if it goes wrong.
You leave with a written plan for one task — which one to hand over first, what it involves, and who checks the work. The plan is clear enough for anyone to build from: your own people, another firm, or us. A plan is not a quote, and there is nothing to buy at the end of it.
If nothing you describe says yes to all four questions, you will be told that rather than handed a plan anyway. A plan we can’t deliver on wastes your time more than a straight answer does. And if the real question is whether AI belongs in your business at all, the better first conversation is Vera.
The conversation runs about fifteen minutes because the questions are about how the work actually happens — who touches it, what they decide, where it goes wrong. Tick-boxes would be quicker and would produce a plan nobody could build from.
About 15 minutes · stop and come back any time · free, and you keep the plan.
Flo is an AI agent — the same kind of thing we build for clients, so you get to use one before you buy one. She asks about your week, not about AI.
What she can do: talk through what takes too long, ask the four questions about each task you mention, and write the plan.
What she can’t do: quote you a price, promise you a result, or tell you how many hours you’ll get back before anyone has timed the work.
Free. Nothing to buy at the end of it.
Work that repeats and follows the same steps each time. Chasing paperwork that hasn’t come back. Putting together the same report every week. Checking one system against another. Sorting incoming requests and sending them to the right person. Typing information from one place into another. A task that only comes up now and then, or whose steps change every time, is not the one to start with.
No. The agent does the repetitive part and a person checks the result. Nobody loses their job; everybody loses their worst hours. If a task can’t be done with a person checking it, we don’t take it on.
About fifteen minutes, and you can stop and come back any time. It takes that long because the questions are about how the work actually happens rather than tick-boxes — who touches it, what they decide, and where it goes wrong.
No. Your information stays yours and is kept separate from everyone else’s. Your data is scrambled so it can’t be read in transit or in storage, is never used for training, and is deleted on a schedule you set.
The stopwatch and the day-60 review exist for exactly that. We time the work by hand before anything is built, measure the same thing afterwards, and put the before and after in front of you. If the numbers don’t justify carrying on, we say so first.
Usually far less than people expect. The agent works from what you already have — email, files, records. If something genuinely isn’t in a usable state, you will hear that in the conversation, not after you’ve committed.
The price depends on the task and on your business, so the exact number comes out of a 20-minute call. The conversation with Flo and the plan she writes are free.
Choosing a task assumes you have already decided AI belongs in your business. If that part is still open, Vera is the better first conversation — and Flo will send you there herself.
You leave with a written plan for one task, yours to keep whatever you do next. Or take twenty minutes with Vasu.
About 15 minutes · stop and come back any time · free, and nothing to buy at the end of it.